On 7/15/26 19:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:39:37 -0700 Stanislav Kinsburskii > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> Please don't do this, this is completely impossible to track for review :) >>> >>> mm review is currently very difficult based on volumes, it'll become >>> impossible >>> to manage if people sound fragments of series. >>> >>> Please just resend the whole thing at this point. >>> >> >> Well, I followed the guidance provided by Andrew, and I believe he >> applied all of the changes, including these, to the `mm` tree. >> >> Do you still want me to send v9 under these circumstances? > > Sure, if that's what reviewers prefer. > > This is a bit unfriendly to people who have already reviewed the code. > Which is one of the reasons why I respond to a new version with a > single diff showing reviewers (and the author, and myself) what changed > since the previous version.
As much as I dislike fixup patches, I tolerate them in reply to the existing series. But having some random fixup series is just crazy, really. -- Cheers, David
