On 11/14/2011 07:54 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:06:42PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >> On 11/14/2011 05:02 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Hellstrom<thellstrom at vmware.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/11/2011 11:47 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> So attached is updated serie of patch with fixes for swaping issue >>>>> that also impacted memory accounting. >>>>> >>>> Jerome, >>>> Out of interest, what was the swapping issue? >>>> >>>> /Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> The page list was NULL and some access ended up freaking the kernel >>> and oom kicked in for some reason i still don't understand. Bottom >>> line things were going south in a split second leaving me with no log >>> or access, i thought it was accounting not working as it was what i >>> tested at the time. I should have tested accouting without the >>> patchset >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jerome >>> >> Still, I think you have a point in the fact that *when* finally the >> OOM killer kicks in, >> it probably doesn't have a way to associate user-space created bos >> with processes >> and kill the right process. >> >> /Thomas >> >> > Btw can you review patch 14 as it touch vmwgfx, i am pretty sure > i got it right. > > Cheers, > Jerome > Yes I will do a more thorough review tomorrow of all unreviewed stuff.
/Thomas