Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) 
to consider:
- [High] The newly added clock names in the device tree binding do not match 
the `fw_name` expected by the clock driver, breaking parent clock resolution.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 04/17] dt-bindings: soc: spacemit: allow eDP/DP PHY PLL 
pixel clocks on K3 APMU ---
commit 4027b4adb6d5e7a26089ca7f70a25150faf1098a
Author: Cody Kang <[email protected]>

dt-bindings: soc: spacemit: allow eDP/DP PHY PLL pixel clocks on K3 APMU

The APMU's eDP pixel-clock muxes select the DP PHY PLLs as parents, so the
K3 syscon takes two clock inputs the other variants do not have.

> diff --git 
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/spacemit/spacemit,k1-syscon.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/spacemit/spacemit,k1-syscon.yaml
> index d3a7c93c3c54f..b8fc6632a3928 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/spacemit/spacemit,k1-syscon.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/spacemit/spacemit,k1-syscon.yaml

[ ... ]

> @@ -31,14 +31,18 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    clocks:
> -    maxItems: 4
> +    minItems: 4
> +    maxItems: 6
>  
>    clock-names:
> +    minItems: 4
>      items:
>        - const: osc
>        - const: vctcxo_1m
>        - const: vctcxo_3m
>        - const: vctcxo_24m
> +      - const: edp0_pll_pxclk
> +      - const: edp1_pll_pxclk

[Severity: High]
Will this mismatch with the clock driver's expected firmware names?

Looking at edp0_pclk_parents in drivers/clk/spacemit/ccu-k3.c, the driver
hardcodes the expected device tree string as "external_clk":

drivers/clk/spacemit/ccu-k3.c:edp0_pclk_parents[] = {
    ...
    CCU_PARENT_NAME(external_clk),
    ...
};

Since this binding strictly mandates "edp0_pll_pxclk" and "edp1_pll_pxclk" 
instead of "external_clk", the Common Clock Framework will search the 
clock-names array for "external_clk" and fail to resolve the parent clocks 
for the eDP pixel clock muxes.

-- 
Sashiko AI review ยท 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=4

Reply via email to