On 7/30/26 3:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > insert_iommu_master() decided whether to allocate a struct > msm_iommu_ctx_dev by testing whether the IOMMU's ctx_list was empty, > caching the result in dev_iommu_priv, then unconditionally dereferenced > the master:
[...] > - dev_warn(dev, "Stream ID 0x%x repeated; ignoring\n", > - sid); > + dev_dbg(dev, "Stream ID 0x%x repeated; ignoring\n", > + sid); Is this intentionally part of the patch? Konrad
