> You've been approved in our CI for future revs.

Thanks!

> Also I came across this issue on i915 for MTL [1] which appears to
> indicate the same issue (ARL and MTL are very close and share the same GuC
> firmware), the suggestion is to disable rc6. Unfortunately Xe
> doesn't have a knob for this, but per [1] you can turn off rc6
> in the BIOS. Maybe worth trying.

Good find - that does look like the same ~2.3s signature, and it being
visible on i915/MTL too is an important data point (Daniele asked
exactly that in the other subthread).

On the rc6 angle: I ran an A/B experiment earlier that should be
equivalent to disabling rc6 at the GT level - holding forcewake across
the whole GT for hours (C6 residency pinned at 0ms for the entire
window, verified) - and still hit 9 timeouts in a row, with the same
~2.3s request-to-ack. So at least keeping the GT out of RC6 does not
avoid the stall here. If the BIOS suggestion covers more than GT RC6
(e.g. package C-states), that would be a different experiment - my
consumer ASUS BIOS does not expose an rc6 knob, but I can look for
C-state options if you think it is worth isolating.

Next on my side: switching to the GuC 70.72.1 build Daniele posted and
reporting back, plus GuC logs from severe stalls are now attached to
the gitlab issue.

Thanks,
Tales

Em qua., 5 de ago. de 2026 às 17:25, Matthew Brost
<[email protected]> escreveu:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 02:29:27PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:19PM -0300, Tales A. Mendonça wrote:
> > > Patchwork reports my address is not on the CI allowlist, so CI was not
> > > triggered for this series:
> > >
> > >     Series author address '[email protected]' is not on the allowlist,
> > > which prevents CI from being automatically triggered.
> > >
> > >   Could one of the project owners click 'retest' on the series (and/or
> > > add me to the allowlist)? Series URL:
> > >
> > >     https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/171539/
> > >
> >
> > We'd have to resend this ourselves. I can do this, but I've requested
> > for you to be on our allow list as well. I'll ping here once that goes
> > through.
> >
>
> You are approved on our CI for future patches.
>
> Also I came across this issue in the i915 for MTL [1] which seems to
> indicate the same issue (ARL and MTL are very close and share same GuC
> firmware), the suggestion there is turn off rc6. Unfortunately Xe
> doesn't have a knob to do this but according to [1] you can turn off rc6
> in the BIOS. Might be worth a try.
>
> Matt
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/work_items/14469
>
> > Matt
> >
> > >   Thanks!
> > >   Tales
> > >
> > >
> > > Em seg., 3 de ago. de 2026 às 23:14, Tales A. Mendonça
> > > <[email protected]> escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This series is a follow-up to the TLB invalidation ack stall I have
> > > > been debugging on ARL, tracked in:
> > > >
> > > >   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8678
> > > >
> > > > Summary of the issue: with GuC 70.53.0 on ARL (reproduced on 7d51 and
> > > > 7dd1 machines here, plus an independent Arc Pro 130T report on the
> > > > issue above), TLB invalidation acks intermittently stall for ~2.3s.
> > > > The H2G request is consumed from the CTB immediately and the G2H CTB
> > > > is empty the whole time - the firmware simply does not send the ack
> > > > until much later. The fence timeout fires at 2.25s and the ack lands
> > > > tens of ms after it. Userspace blocked on the invalidation (compositor
> > > > buffer unmaps etc.) hitches for the full window.
> > > >
> > > > Patch 1 adds xe_devcoredump_gt() so this kind of hang - which has no
> > > > exec queue or job to blame - leaves a devcoredump with the GuC log and
> > > > CT state behind (Matt suggested capturing devcoredumps when we
> > > > discussed the issue; devcoredumps from both machines are attached to
> > > > the issue above).
> > > >
> > > > Patch 2 logs when the ack for a timed out invalidation finally
> > > > arrives. This is what established that the acks are late rather than
> > > > lost.
> > > >
> > > > Patch 3 is the RFC part: a delayed work that pokes the GuC (status
> > > > register read, CT flush, doorbell ring) every 250ms while an ack is
> > > > overdue. On my machines this converts the guaranteed 2.3s stall into a
> > > > sub-500ms hiccup for the majority of occurrences; a minority of severe
> > > > episodes ignore 8-9 consecutive doorbells, which points at the GuC
> > > > firmware being internally blocked for the whole window. Full data on
> > > > the issue. I am happy to rework the approach (different delay,
> > > > tying it to the G2H handler, dropping the status read, etc.) - mainly
> > > > I would like the firmware side investigated, since no host-side poke
> > > > can fix the severe cases.
> > > >
> > > > Based on drm-tip. Tested for several days on both ARL machines under
> > > > desktop and VM-heavy workloads.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Tales
> > > >
> > > > Tales A. Mendonça (3):
> > > >   drm/xe: Capture devcoredump on TLB invalidation timeout
> > > >   drm/xe: Log when a timed out TLB invalidation ack finally arrives
> > > >   drm/xe: Kick GuC while TLB invalidation acks are overdue
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c     |  68 ++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.h     |   6 ++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c       | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h |  42 ++++++++
> > > >  4 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.55.0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Com os cumprimentos,
> > >
> > > Tales A. Mendonça
> > > talesam.org
> > > communitybig.org



-- 
Com os cumprimentos,

Tales A. Mendonça
talesam.org
communitybig.org

Reply via email to