In amdgpu_ras_recovery_fini(), mutex_destroy(&con->page_rsv_lock) was
called prior to cancel_work_sync(&con->recovery_work) and
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&con->page_retirement_dwork).

If pending work ran during teardown, it could attempt to acquire
page_rsv_lock after its destruction, leading to a locking violation and
potential use-after-free.

Fix this by moving cancel_work_sync(&con->recovery_work) and
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&con->page_retirement_dwork) before
mutex_destroy(&con->page_rsv_lock), ensuring both work items are
synchronously canceled while the lock remains intact.

Signed-off-by: Sreeraj S Kurup <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 764cd4950408..1d6b4300d80a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -3994,15 +3994,14 @@ static int amdgpu_ras_recovery_fini(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev)
        if (con->page_retirement_thread)
                kthread_stop(con->page_retirement_thread);
 
+       cancel_work_sync(&con->recovery_work);
+       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&con->page_retirement_dwork);
+
        atomic_set(&con->page_retirement_req_cnt, 0);
        atomic_set(&con->poison_creation_count, 0);
 
        mutex_destroy(&con->page_rsv_lock);
 
-       cancel_work_sync(&con->recovery_work);
-
-       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&con->page_retirement_dwork);
-
        amdgpu_ras_ecc_log_fini(&con->umc_ecc_log);
 
        mutex_lock(&con->recovery_lock);
-- 
2.54.0

Reply via email to