On 8/20/26 7:56 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 10:33:04PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> On 8/19/26 1:12 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 07:19:14PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> Add the connector-level infrastructure to support HDMI 2.0 scrambling:
>>>>
>>>> - A drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported() helper to report whether
>>>>   the source supports the scrambling capability, based on the presence
>>>>   of the newly introduced .scrambler_{enable|disable}() callbacks in
>>>>   drm_connector_hdmi_funcs are mandatory
>>>> - A scrambler_needed flag to be managed by the hdmi state helpers based
>>>>   on the negotiated TMDS character rate and the source/sink scrambling
>>>>   capabilities
>>>> - A scrambler_enabled flag to track whether scrambling is currently
>>>>   active
>>>> - A delayed work item (scdc_work) to monitor sink-side scrambling status
>>>>   and retry the setup if the sink resets it
>>>> - A scdc_work_initialized flag to support lazy initialization of the
>>>>   work item on the first scrambling enable and guard the teardown paths
>>>>
>>>> These are intended to be used by SCDC scrambling helpers to coordinate
>>>> scrambling setup and teardown between the source driver and the DRM
>>>> core.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Maud Spierings <[email protected]>
>>>> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <[email protected]>  # NanoPC-T6 LTS, 
>>>> Rock 5B
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 31 ++++++++++++---
>>>>  include/drm/drm_connector.h     | 83 
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c 
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>>>> index 4721cdeafc84..a18410faf040 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>>>> @@ -622,12 +622,29 @@ int drmm_connector_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>     * default with the actual controller capability. A value of zero keeps
>>>>     * the limit inferred from supported_hdmi_ver.
>>>>     */
>>>> -  if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0)
>>>> +  if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0) {
>>>> +          if (!hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || 
>>>> !hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>>>> +                  drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks missing for HDMI 
>>>> 2.x\n");
>>>> +                  return -EINVAL;
>>>> +          }
>>>> +
>>>>            connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> HDMI_2_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>>> -  else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
>>>> -          connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>>> -  else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
>>>> -          connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>>> +  } else {
>>>> +          /*
>>>> +           * Scrambler callbacks are only valid for connectors advertising
>>>> +           * HDMI 2.0 capability. drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported()
>>>> +           * relies on their presence to report scrambling support.
>>>> +           */
>>>> +          if (hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || 
>>>> hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>>>> +                  drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks unexpected for HDMI 
>>>> 1.x\n");
>>>> +                  return -EINVAL;
>>>> +          }
>>>> +
>>>> +          if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
>>>> +                  connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>>> +          else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
>>>> +                  connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>>> +  }
>>>
>>> I'd put it into a separate test (possibly earlier). Merging both the
>>> tmds rate default and the scrambler callbacks check makes it messier
>>> than it would be if we had two separate tests.
>>
>> Ack. How about the following?
>>
>>      if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0)
>>              connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>> HDMI_2_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>      else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_3)
>>              connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>> HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>      else if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_1_0)
>>              connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>> HDMI_1_0_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
>>
>>      if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate) {
>>              if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate > 
>> connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate) {
>>                      drm_err(dev, "Enforced max_tmds_char_rate exceeds %llu 
>> spec limit\n",
>>                              connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate);
>>                      return -EINVAL;
>>              }
>>
>>              connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>> hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate;
>>      }
>>
>>      if (hdmi_funcs->supported_hdmi_ver >= HDMI_VERSION_2_0) {
>>              if (!hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || 
>> !hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>>                      drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks missing for HDMI 
>> 2.x\n");
>>                      return -EINVAL;
>>              }
>>      } else {
>>              /*
>>               * Scrambler callbacks are only valid for connectors advertising
>>               * HDMI 2.0 capability. drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported()
>>               * relies on their presence to report scrambling support.
>>               */
>>              if (hdmi_funcs->scrambler_enable || 
>> hdmi_funcs->scrambler_disable) {
>>                      drm_err(dev, "Scrambler callbacks unexpected for HDMI 
>> 1.x\n");
>>                      return -EINVAL;
>>              }
>>      }
> 
> I don't think we need the else clause at all. It's not valid, but it's
> also not creating any issue.

As discussed a while ago, we used to have a scrambler_supported flag, inferred
from supported_hdmi_ver, which allowed helpers to verify the capability when
needed.  That flag has now been removed and replaced by
drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported(), which relies exclusively on the
presence of the scrambler callbacks to report whether the capability is
supported. 

If we don't ensure that these callbacks are *not* set for HDMI 1.x cases, one
could set supported_hdmi_ver to HDMI_VERSION_1_4, for example, while still
providing the scrambler_{enable,disable} funcs.  This would lead to an
inconsistency between the maximum TMDS character rate inferred from
supported_hdmi_ver and the capability reported by
drm_connector_hdmi_scrambler_supported().

> I'd move that second check earlier together with the infoframe callbacks
> checks and so on too.

Ack.

>>>>    if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate) {
>>>>            if (hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate > 
>>>> connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate) {
>>>> @@ -635,6 +652,7 @@ int drmm_connector_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>                            connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate);
>>>>                    return -EINVAL;
>>>>            }
>>>> +
>>>>            connector->hdmi.max_tmds_char_rate = 
>>>> hdmi_funcs->supported_tmds_char_rate;
>>>>    }
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +  /**
>>>> +   * @scdc_work: Work item currently used to monitor sink-side scrambling
>>>> +   * status and retry setup if the sink resets it.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  struct delayed_work scdc_work;
>>>> +
>>>> +  /**
>>>> +   * @scdc_work_initialized: Tracks whether @scdc_work has been set up via
>>>> +   * INIT_DELAYED_WORK(). The work item is initialized lazily on the first
>>>> +   * scrambling enable, so this guards the teardown paths against touching
>>>> +   * an uninitialized work item.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  bool scdc_work_initialized;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Why should we track whether it's initialized or not? I'd always
>>> initialize it, but only ever schedule something if we're using the
>>> scrambler.
>>
>> Having this initialized in the connector would lead to a module dependency
>> cycle.
>>
>> Currently the work function lives in drm_hdmi_helper.c, which is built into
>> drm_display_helper module:
>>
>> static void drm_connector_hdmi_scdc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>>      [...]
>>      if (READ_ONCE(connector->hdmi.scrambler_enabled) &&
>>          !drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status(connector))
>>              drm_connector_hdmi_try_scrambling_setup(connector);
>>      [...]
>> }
>>
>> int drm_connector_hdmi_enable_scrambling(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>                                       const struct drm_connector_state 
>> *conn_state)
>> {
>>
>>      [...]
>>      if (!hdmi->scdc_work_initialized) {
>>              INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hdmi->scdc_work,
>>                                drm_connector_hdmi_scdc_work);
>>              hdmi->scdc_work_initialized = true;
>>      }
>>      [...]
>> }
>>
>> If we move INIT_DELAYED_WORK() into the connector (i.e. in drm.ko), the work
>> function has to be reachable from there.  The following attempts to 
>> accomplish
>> that would fail:
>>
>> - Keep the work function in drm_hdmi_helper.c and export it from
>>   drm_display_helper.
>>
>> - Move the work function into drm_connector.c and export 
>>   drm_connector_hdmi_try_scrambling_setup(), or a wrapper function, from 
>>   drm_display_helper.
> 
> An alternative could be to move drm_connector_hdmi_init to
> drm_hdmi_helper.c, no?

I haven't considered this option so far, as I believe it would also require some
refactoring to get right - for example, moving HDMI-related initialization from
the generic drm_connector_init_only() to drm_connector_hdmi_init(), and
splitting drm_connector_cleanup() into a dedicated drm_connector_hdmi_cleanup()
utility.

> But yeah, if we can't let's keep it like that

Should I proceed with this refactoring, or would it be better to postpone it
until I send out the HDMI 2.1 patches, to avoid expanding this series even
further?

Thanks,
Cristian

Reply via email to