On 8/26/26 7:17 AM, Jellis Onsea | AccessWeb wrote:
> Hi Maaz,
> 
> Short version: mesa 26.2.1 is running here with 3D on, and the leak is still 
> there.
> 
> Setup: one boot, 119 h, a single kwin_wayland (6.7.4), mesa 3:26.2.1-1, 
> kernel 7.2.0, renderer SVGA3D.
> 
>   TTM sys+mob    0.36 -> 16.73 GB
>   objects        1948 -> 10365
>   kwin_wayland   holds 8484 MB in 4894 objects
>   free RAM       4.9 of 31 GB - we have to reboot today
> 
> It tracks rendering, not uptime. Idle nights (02:00-07:00) in this same boot:
> 
>   22 Aug  -0.03 GB       25 Aug  +0.00 GB
>   23 Aug  +0.02 GB       26 Aug  +0.04 GB
>   24 Aug  +1.88 GB   <- the one night an automated GUI test run was active
> 
> The surface warning still fires: 1168 WARNING blocks at 
> vmw_surface_handle_reference in the last 27 hours. That is a window, not a 
> total - journald has already rotated away the earlier part of this boot.
> 
> Correction to my previous mail: "four times during session startup" was 
> wrong. It fires in bursts throughout the session.
> 
> We have not tried "drm/vmwgfx: Return gem fd handle for scanout buffers" we 
> run distribution kernels here. Say the word and we will build it.
Yes please, can you go ahead and try that patch, it fixes some errors on kde 
and might fix this issue you are facing too.

> Best regards,
> Jellis
> 
> Op 21-08-2026 om 04:09 schreef Maaz Mombasawala:
>> For the 3D-enabled case, could you try with mesa 26.1.8 or 26.2.1, both of 
>> which contain my fix.
>> Also if you could try the patch I just submitted on dri-devel - drm/vmwgfx: 
>> Return gem fd handle for scanout buffers.
>> If you still see issues with these patches, let me know.
>>
>> As for the 3D disabled case, I can see issues on my local machine and am 
>> working on a fix.
>>
>> PS - Your emails are overly verbose and narrative, could you include only 
>> the actual problems you are facing.
>> If you're using an llm to write these, please make them more terse and human 
>> readable. Thanks.
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Maaz Mombasawala <[email protected]>

Reply via email to