Hi krzysztof,

...

> @@ -80,8 +83,9 @@ int live_rc6_manual(void *arg)
>       res[1] = rc6_residency(rc6);
>       rc0_freq = intel_rps_read_actual_frequency_fw(rps);
>       if ((res[1] - res[0]) >> 10) {
> -             pr_err("RC6 residency increased by %lldus while disabled for 
> 1000ms!\n",
> -                    (res[1] - res[0]) >> 10);
> +             drm_err(&i915->drm,
> +                     "RC6 residency increased by %lldus while disabled for 
> 1000ms!\n",
> +                     (res[1] - res[0]) >> 10);

yeah... I think here we should be using gt_err()

>               err = -EINVAL;
>               goto out_unlock;
>       }
> @@ -92,10 +96,12 @@ int live_rc6_manual(void *arg)
>  
>               if (!rc0_power) {
>                       if (rc0_freq)
> -                             pr_err("No power measured while in RC0! GPU 
> Freq: %uMHz in RC0\n",
> -                                    rc0_freq);
> +                             drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> +                                     "No power measured while in RC0! GPU 
> Freq: %uMHz in RC0\n",
> +                                     rc0_freq);

this is moving from _err level to _dbg level.

Andi

>                       else
> -                             pr_err("No power and freq measured while in 
> RC0\n");
> +                             drm_err(&i915->drm,
> +                                     "No power and freq measured while in 
> RC0\n");
>                       err = -EINVAL;
>                       goto out_unlock;
>               }

Reply via email to