Hi, On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 8:26 AM Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ah, indeed! I missed that since it didn't have "panel" in the name. > > FWIW, then I think for this patch: > > > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> > > > > ...but, ironically, that means that for the other patch I looked at > > (ti-sn65dsi86.c) we're missing the "select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE" since it > > uses the same API call, doesn't it? > > Ouch, indeed! Thanks for noticing.
That was part of what confused me initially. I saw one of the drivers selecting DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE and the other one not doing so, even though (as far as I could tell) whey were both using the same API calls. ;-) > I will send v3 with that fixed, can I keep your R-by if there's just that > change to the sn65dsi86 patch? Yeah, it's fine to keep my R-b. -Doug
