On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> The RZ/G3E Soc has 2 LCD controller (LCDC), contain a Frame Compression
> Processor (FCPVD), a Video Signal Processor (VSPD), Video Signal
> Processor (VSPD), and Display Unit (DU).
> 
>  - LCDC0 supports DSI and LVDS (single or dual-channel) outputs.
>  - LCDC1 supports DSI, LVDS (single-channel), and RGB outputs.
> 
> Add new SoC-specific compatible string 'renesas,r9a09g047-du'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <[email protected]>
> ---
> v7->v8:
>  - Rebased on top of RZ/G3L du support [1]
>  - Modelled using ports/port instead of port/ep.
>    [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>  - Improved commit msg and commit body.
> 
> v6->v7:
>  - Rebased on top of [1]
>    [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>  - Use single DRM device aggregating both DU instances (1 DU dt node),
>    modelling single port for each DU0, DU1 and multiple endpoints for
>    outputs.
> 
> v5->v6:
>  - Extend patternProperties from "^port@[0-1]$" to "^port@[0-3]$" and
>    explicitly disable port@2 and port@3 for existing SoCs that do not expose
>    them.
>  - Reworked ports numbering + improved/fixed ports descriptions in the
>    bindings documentation.
>  - Improved commit body.
> 
> v4->v5:
>  - Dropped renesas,id property and updated bindings
>    accordingly.
> 
> v2->v3:
>  - No changes.
> 
> v2->v3:
>  - No changes.
> 
> v1->v2:
>  - Use single compatible string instead of multiple compatible strings
>    for the two DU instances, leveraging a 'renesas,id' property to
>    differentiate between DU0 and DU1.
>  - Updated commit message accordingly.
> 
>  .../bindings/display/renesas,rzg2l-du.yaml    | 95 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,rzg2l-du.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,rzg2l-du.yaml
> index 5c9b15a09dee..d44c7c0add8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,rzg2l-du.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,rzg2l-du.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
>            - renesas,r9a07g043u-du # RZ/G2UL
>            - renesas,r9a07g044-du # RZ/G2{L,LC}
>            - renesas,r9a08g046-du # RZ/G3L
> +          - renesas,r9a09g047-du # RZ/G3E
>            - renesas,r9a09g057-du # RZ/V2H(P)
>            - renesas,r9a09g077-du # RZ/T2H
>        - items:
> @@ -35,25 +36,51 @@ properties:
>            - const: renesas,r9a09g077-du # RZ/T2H fallback
>  
>    reg:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: du.0
> +      - const: du.1

du is the name of the device, thus calling items "0" and "1" is pretty
pointless - indices already define that. Please drop the reg-names.

>  
>    interrupts:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: du.0
> +      - const: du.1

Same here

>  
>    clocks:
> +    minItems: 3
>      items:
>        - description: Main clock
>        - description: Register access clock
>        - description: Video clock
> +      - description: Main clock for DU1
> +      - description: Register access clock for DU1
> +      - description: Video clock for DU1
>  
>    clock-names:
> +    minItems: 3
>      items:
>        - const: aclk
>        - const: pclk
>        - const: vclk
> +      - const: aclk1
> +      - const: pclk1
> +      - const: vclk1
>  
>    resets:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  reset-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: resetn
> +      - const: resetn1

Drop reset-names

>  
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -66,7 +93,7 @@ properties:
>        model-dependent. Each port shall have a single endpoint.
>  
>      patternProperties:
> -      "^port@[0-2]$":
> +      "^port@[0-3]$":
>          $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>          unevaluatedProperties: false
>  
> @@ -110,6 +137,7 @@ allOf:
>                description: DPI
>              port@1: false
>              port@2: false
> +            port@3: false

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to