On Fri, 2026-09-04 at 10:39 +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote: > Please wait a bit until we discussed it for a bit.
Understood. No respin from me until you and Christian have settled the direction. > Do you generate part of your mails with an LLM? It seems to be a huge > corpus for 11min of time between receiving and answer Yes, I draft them with LLM assistance. I should have said so up front, sorry. What I do not delegate is the checking: I verify the claims against the tree before sending, and I am answerable for whatever goes out under my name. The bug report itself came out of my own KASAN testing. Your point about the volume is fair, and there is a concrete example of why you are right to push back. In the v4 commit message I asserted that "every in-tree driver passes a string literal". That is wrong: panthor kasprintf()s the name (panthor_sched.c:3591) and kfree()s it in group_free_queue(). So Christian's objection to caching holds for an in-tree driver today, not just in theory, and I should have caught that before sending rather than after. I will keep the mails shorter and slower. Tvrtko, thanks for the quick answer on the tracepoints - the comment makes it clear those call sites are fine, so I will drop that point. Jonghyuk
