Hi. On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 05:44:18PM +0800, linuszeng via B4 Relay <[email protected]> wrote: > No functional change is intended: protection semantics and the cgroup > v1/v2 behaviour are preserved.
It is not clear from the description what is the intention then :-) Do you have any measurements that the reduced cache footprint changes performance for setups without protection? And what is the positive impact on protected scenarios where the counters are in (possibly) different cacheline and one indirection further? Thanks, Michal
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
