On Mon Sep 7, 2026 at 11:10 AM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Note: new kernel policy [1] asks that the specific model is not named, so > this should just be `Assisted-by: LLM`.
Got it, thanks! I was checking what other people did and noticed a lot of mentions of Claude, etc., so I went with it. Changed for v2. > Thanks, this patch looks correct and I would like to merge it early, but > one thing about the comment: it carries way more context than needed and > reads heavily, as is often the case when AI-generated. For instance, > "declare that to the DMA layer" is obvious from the method we are > calling. Make sure to give a human pass to such comments as they can > make the code tedious when they accumulate. Thanks! I agree. I was unsure about that and decided to leave a bit more in for the review. I'll just use your comment verbatim. > Since this seems to be your first patch, this is a good opportunity to > practice sending a v2. :) Yes, submitting patches to the mailing list was certainly a new experience. Thank you for your help and time so far!
