On 9/12/26 00:11, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> The kernel-doc comment of dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() refers to
> dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling, which was renamed to
> dma_fence_enable_signaling by commit 9370a5c664e8 ("dma-buf: rename
> dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling"). Say dma_fence_enable_signaling.
>
> Fixes: 9370a5c664e8 ("dma-buf: rename dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <[email protected]>
I'm really wondering why that was not automatically renamed.
Anyway reviewed and pushed to drm-misc-next.
Thanks,
Christian.
> ---
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index
> 158cd609f1036e56668867f092041213cbf30427..3aa85be43aada5a80ea2e1cecc5f76824b434d14
> 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(struct dma_fence *fence)
> * Returns true if the fence was already signaled, false if not. Since this
> * function doesn't enable signaling, it is not guaranteed to ever return
> * true if dma_fence_add_callback(), dma_fence_wait() or
> - * dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling() haven't been called before.
> + * dma_fence_enable_signaling() haven't been called before.
> *
> * This function requires &dma_fence.lock to be held.
> *
