On Wed, 2026-09-16 at 12:35 +0200, Natalie Vock wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/16/26 11:44, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > On Tue, 2026-09-15 at 17:48 +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > The blunt reality is that I don't have time to look into patches > > > or > > > bugs > > > any more as it would be necessary. The same counts for Ray. > > > > > > Natalie has been working on the dmem cgroup patches for TTM and > > > agreed > > > to take over looking more into TTM. > > > > > > Arun is working in my team and already maintaining AMDs VRAM > > > backend > > > for > > > TTM and the underlying buddy allocator. > > > > > > Add Thomas as reviewer as well, better to have more eyes on that > > > component. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 5 +++-- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 5b5a4e4b35cf..b6e58a138501 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -9140,10 +9140,11 @@ > > > F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen* > > > F: include/drm/drm_privacy_screen* > > > > > > DRM TTM SUBSYSTEM > > > -M: Christian Koenig <[email protected]> > > > -M: Huang Rui <[email protected]> > > > +M: Natalie Vock <[email protected]> > > > +M: Arun Pravin <[email protected]> > > > R: Matthew Auld <[email protected]> > > > R: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> > > > +R: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> > > > L: [email protected] > > > S: Maintained > > > T: git https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> > > > > @Natalie, @Arun Do you have a presence on dri-devel IRC? If so, > > Nicks? > > Yes, I have the nick "pixelcluster". > > > > > Also what is your stance on merging pages to TTM? > > 1) Requiring an explicit maintainer ack, or > > 2) an R-B from one of the reviewers/maintainers and no concerns > > raised > > within reasonable time? > > I think my preference would more or less be 2). That is, if for some > reason no maintainer answers, after some time the patches should be > ok > to merge (but if a maintainer does explicitly ack/R-b the patch it > can > be merged sooner). I'll try my best to not leave patches unanswered > so > hopefully 2) stays a rarity :) > > > 3) drm-misc as default merge repo? > > Sure, why not? Basically like it's been so far as well, right? It > didn't > seem to me like the patch volume for TTM is particularly large at > least > so far, so something like a separate branch might not be worth the > hassle.
Great. Thanks. Reason for the last question was more that if we want to merge TTM patches outside of the default branch if they are required for a driver feature, and then we always ask for ack to merge on a different branch / repo. If we have an agreed default we typically don't ask for a separate merge ack on that one. /Thomas > > Best, > Natalie
