On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:17:34 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > But on the other hand the test coverage is nice, and maybe one day if > we add enough devmem support in netdevsim we'll be able to fuzz the > data path or something. Is there a way to get the best of both worlds? > Like put a comment on top of netdevsim that this is test simulator > device and any missing functionality and/or bugs in it should be > medium criticality max or something? Or is it too much trouble and I > should drop the netdevsim support and tests?
I already strip Fixes tags and apply the patches to net-next. But it's still a burden. If you're signing up to fix the issues / review the slop we can try.
