On 04/02/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:39PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clark<rob.clark at linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds >>> <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>>> - drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but >>>> didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for >>>> 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their >>>> lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I >>>> won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please". >>> >>> yes, please :-) >>> >>> Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed >>> by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, >>> omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be >>> pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle. >> Yes, Please. >> >> It's used for exynos display and multimedia. > > Thirded. > > There are a lot of loose pieces to juggle until we have everything in > place for buffer sharing (and quite a few of this involve contentious > topics). But this core piece for integrating dma-buf with drm here has > been acked/reviewd by all the relevant people and merging it would imo > greatly help in wiring up all the other loose ends. > > Cheers, Daniel
(yes, please) ++ I have been using the dma-buf with dma-mapping(Marek's patches) on origen(exynos4210), and basic things are good. I wish this gets into kernel along with the dma-mapping support asap. Regards, Subash
