Hi Krzysztof
On 30/10/2026 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/10/2026 11:44, [email protected] wrote:
>> I ran checkpatch.pl, with and without --strict, on both patches. The
>
> I don't believe in such case that you run on any valid kernel tree.
>
> Please fix your workflow, because it seems you work on some ancient
> tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel (don't,
> instead use mainline).
Sorry, my mistake.
I ran checkpatch.pl from the drm-misc tree's drm-misc-next branch, which the
series is based on.
That tree does not have commit 1e035297ffda ("docs: remove Assisted-by
references") yet, so its checkpatch.pl still accepts the Assisted-by tag.
With checkpatch.pl from mainline I can see the warnings now. I will drop the
tag in v6 and check the patches with checkpatch.pl from mainline before sending.
One question so I get v6 right: should I keep basing the series on
drm-misc-next, since the bridge patches go through drm-misc, and only
use mainline for checkpatch.pl and the other tools? Or would you prefer the
series to be based on mainline?
Thanks,
Hermes
