Hi Luca, On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 06:56:41PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Fri Oct 30, 2026 at 5:32 PM CET, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > > The remote endpoint node is not necessarily a panel, so drop the "panel" > > naming and refer to the next bridge instead. Update the error message > > printed when no output port is connected. > > > > While at it, convert the device_node handling in fsl_ldb_probe() to use > > the __free(device_node) cleanup helper. Since remote1 and remote2 now > > stay valid until the function returns, pass the selected one directly to > > of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() and drop the extra panel_node reference. > > Do the same for the dual-link port1/port2 lookups. > > > > No functional change intended, other than the updated error message. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <[email protected]> > > I wanted to test this patch but it does not apply on current > drm-misc-next.
Sorry about that, I made these changes on top of Dario's patch [1], touching the same file. I thought that would probably be applied first. FWIW, my patch applies cleanly on drm-misc-next if [1] is applied first. Do you want me to resend the patch so that it applies directly on top of drm-misc-next? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ -- Thanks, Laurentiu
