On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 06:34:40PM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:55:49PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > When __ttm_pool_alloc() fails to allocate a chunk at the device's
> > beneficial order and falls back to a smaller order, the object ends up
> > backed by a sub-optimal set of pages. Nothing currently records this, so
> > a driver has no way to know an object would benefit from being re-backed
> > with beneficial-order pages later.
> > 
> > Add TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED to struct ttm_tt page_flags,
> > cleared at the start of every fresh allocation (in both ttm_pool_alloc()
> > and ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc()). Set it in __ttm_pool_alloc() when an
> > allocation at exactly the beneficial order fails before dropping to a
> > lower order.
> > 
> > Drivers can use this hint to queue the buffer object for later
> > defragmentation.
> > 
> > Cc: Carlos Santa <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ryan Neph <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Christian Koenig <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> > Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
> > Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h       | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> > index 5b7d7f5ae53d..e9175c0290d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> > @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, 
> > struct ttm_tt *tt,
> >                         struct ttm_pool_alloc_state *alloc,
> >                         struct ttm_pool_tt_restore *restore)
> > {
> > +   const unsigned int beneficial_order = ttm_pool_beneficial_order(pool);
> >     enum ttm_caching page_caching;
> >     gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_USER;
> >     pgoff_t caching_divide;
> > @@ -846,6 +847,16 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, 
> > struct ttm_tt *tt,
> >             /* If that fails, lower the order if possible and retry. */
> >             if (!p) {
> >                     if (order) {
> > +                           /*
> > +                            * Failing to allocate at the device's 
> > beneficial
> > +                            * order means we are about to back this object
> > +                            * with a sub-optimal (smaller order) set of
> > +                            * pages. Record it so the driver can later try 
> > to
> > +                            * defragment the object back to beneficial 
> > order.
> > +                            */
> > +                           if (beneficial_order && order == 
> > beneficial_order)
> > +                                   tt->page_flags |=
> > +                                           
> > TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> 
> I haven't looked at beneficial_reclaim_backoff usecase yet, but this flag
> gets set irrespective of whether the allocation failure resulted with/without
> the beneficial_reclaim_backoff request from the driver. Is that intended?
> 

Yes. The end goal (the series on list needs a slight Xe side tweak) it
everything in the foreground (new memory allocations, swapin after
shrinking, etc..) sets beneficial_reclaim_backoff (no reclaim). In that
case if we don't get optimial pages, the defragmenter in the background
does aggresive reclaim and then prunes in pages it finds at
beneficial_order in a way we don't miss page flips.

Matt

> Other than that, the change here LGTM, though I still need to look at how 
> driver uses
> this flag in more detail.
> 
> Niranjana
> 
> >                             --order;
> >                             page_caching = tt->caching;
> >                             allow_pools = true;
> > @@ -910,6 +921,7 @@ int ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt 
> > *tt,
> >     if (WARN_ON(ttm_tt_is_backed_up(tt)))
> >             return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > +   tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> >     ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(tt, &alloc);
> > 
> >     return __ttm_pool_alloc(pool, tt, ctx, &alloc, NULL);
> > @@ -942,6 +954,7 @@ int ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, 
> > struct ttm_tt *tt,
> >     if (!restore) {
> >             gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
> > 
> > +           tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> >             ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(tt, &alloc);
> >             if (ctx->gfp_retry_mayfail)
> >                     gfp |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
> > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
> > index 406437ad674b..ce7533677d77 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
> > @@ -90,6 +90,14 @@ struct ttm_tt {
> >      * TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP: TTM internal only. This is set if the
> >      * struct ttm_tt has been (possibly partially) backed up.
> >      *
> > +    * TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED: Set by the TTM pool allocator
> > +    * when at least one chunk that could have been allocated at the pool's
> > +    * beneficial order had to fall back to a smaller order. This indicates
> > +    * that a sub-optimal set of pages was chosen for this object, and can
> > +    * be used by drivers to queue the buffer object for later
> > +    * defragmentation. Drivers should access this via the
> > +    * ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed() helper.
> > +    *
> >      * TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED: TTM internal only. DO NOT USE. This is
> >      * set by TTM after ttm_tt_populate() has successfully returned, and is
> >      * then unset when TTM calls ttm_tt_unpopulate().
> > @@ -101,8 +109,9 @@ struct ttm_tt {
> > #define TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE       BIT(3)
> > #define TTM_TT_FLAG_DECRYPTED               BIT(4)
> > #define TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP               BIT(5)
> > +#define TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED        BIT(6)
> > 
> > -#define TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED BIT(6)
> > +#define TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED BIT(7)
> >     uint32_t page_flags;
> >     /** @num_pages: Number of pages in the page array. */
> >     uint32_t num_pages;
> > @@ -179,6 +188,19 @@ static inline void ttm_tt_clear_backed_up(struct 
> > ttm_tt *tt)
> >     tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP;
> > }
> > 
> > +/**
> > + * ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed() - Whether the tt is backed at a
> > + * sub-optimal page order
> > + * @tt: The struct ttm_tt.
> > + *
> > + * Return: true if the pool allocator had to fall back below the pool's
> > + * beneficial order when backing this tt, false otherwise.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed(const struct ttm_tt 
> > *tt)
> > +{
> > +   return tt->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> >  * ttm_tt_create
> >  *
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 

Reply via email to