* Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:38:43PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * Dave Airlie wrote: > > > I get the feeling the drm can just be a virtual platform device of > > > some sort, then it reads the device tree and binds all the information > > > on what crtc/encoders are available, > > > That's pretty much what I've come up with in the second round of Tegra DRM > > patches. Basically display controllers and outputs (RGB, HDMI, TVO, DSI) get > > separate drivers and register themselves with the DRM driver which then > > looks > > at the device tree to see which display controllers to register as CRTCs and > > parses a list of connector nodes to create encoder/connector pairs that > > define the physical connectors and their corresponding outputs. > > > I did take a brief look at the SDRM patches as well and they didn't quite > > seem to fit what was needed for Tegra. But if time allows I'll take a closer > > look. > > This sounds an awful lot like how ASoC hangs together...
What in particular sounds awful? Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120420/a3a3e867/attachment.pgp>
