On 21.04.2012 16:08, Jerome Glisse wrote: > 2012/4/21 Christian K?nig<deathsimple at vodafone.de>: >> Interesting, I'm pretty sure that I haven't touched the locking order of the >> cs_mutex vs. vm_mutex. >> >> Maybe it is just some kind of side effect, going to locking into it anyway. >> >> Christian. >> > It's the using, init path take lock in different order than cs path Well, could you explain to me why the vm code takes cs mutex in the first place?
It clearly has it's own mutex and it doesn't looks like that it deals with any cs related data anyway. Christian.
