On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:06 -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > > Well, as I said, it's not an issue for me and from my side it can be > > improved later. > > yeah, when CMA is actually merged, there are a few other things I'd > like to do to, incl converting omapfb over to use CMA and remove > omap_vram.. but I guess those will be other patches.
Right, I just realized CMA is not in the kernel, nor does it seem to be in the linux-next. Is there a reason why you want it already merged? Wouldn't it be easier to get it in only when it can actually be used. Especially if there's room for improvement. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120315/9aa3fa92/attachment.pgp>