On 06.09.2012 15:01, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >> On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D?nzer wrote: >>> From: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >> Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number? > Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth > doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use > latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm > release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum > version for radeonsi. Ok, that makes sense.
>> Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> > Thanks, is that for the whole series? Yes it is, and also for the four patches to radeonsi which depends on this change. Christian.
