On 07/01/2013 11:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth > <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> wrote: >> - TDA998x irq handling - ignored >> - TDA998x sync fix - ignored > > At least the sync fix, looks like I missed it (it probably is a good > idea to CC me if you want me to look at it). Looks like there was > some follow-up discussion on both patches, unless I missed seeing a > newer version of those patches.
Yeah, I will update the patch for current mainline linux as it was based on some of Russell's RFC patches. > Sometimes if you think a patch has been ignored/forgotten, it doesn't > hurt to ping on mailing list or #dri-devel.. a lot of us are working > not just on kernel (the relatively small part in the whole linux > graphics stack), but also mesa and/or x11. Some times things end up > several pages down in the mail folder. It's not because we are all > sitting on a beach drinking margaritas, or because we don't like you. > It is just because we are busy and missed it. > > Last few months I've been pretty buried in r/e + gallium driver for > new gpu, so I wasn't always checking dri-devel list every day. At > least now I am in drm-driver mode again ;-) It is ok, I don't blame anyone here. Darren wants to test it on tilcdc. I also found a datasheet for TDA9983b which is kind of compatible but has more information about register layout in it. IIRC digikey also has it. >> - Fix drm I2C slave encoder probing >> > If you have a better idea about how to make the slave encoder probing > better (and/or more generic to support stuff other than i2c), please > send RFC patch. (And if you already did this, please send updated > version, see previous point about sometimes missing patches.) Also, will send an updated fix. Sebastian