Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> writes: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:40:16PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> writes: >> >> > We could just unconditionally increase the alignement in >> > intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj - we already have more strict requirements due >> > to a bunch of w/a in other places. So shouldn't hurt at all really. >> >> That seems like a fine plan; 32kB isn't that onerous. Do you want the >> trivial patch to do this from me then? > > Yes please, merging patches from other people is much easier than begging for > review for my own ;-) > -Daniel
Here's a replacement for patch #4 that just adds the alignment requirement there. Do you want any other changes in this series?
