Jordan Justen <jljusten at gmail.com> writes:
> After patch 6, this will add SARGB8, right? So, maybe add this to the > commit message, or separate out adding SARGB8 into a separate commit? I added the SARGB8 define in patch 4; is there some other separation you think would be warranted? Oh, just so everyone knows -- krh and I chatted for a while this morning and decided that this whole __DRI_IMAGE_FORMAT_* stuff is just a bad idea and we should remove it all and just use __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC_* everywhere. I didn't want to mix that change up with this series though. > Patches 1-6: Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com> Thanks! -- keith.packard at intel.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131104/6f56960e/attachment.pgp>