Hi,
On 09/19/2013 11:41 PM, Russell King wrote:
> Replace the following sequence:
>
> dma_set_mask(dev, mask);
> dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, mask);
>
> with a call to the new helper dma_set_mask_and_coherent().
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
> index 78a3506..96b6c97 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
> @@ -1413,8 +1413,7 @@ struct vio_dev *vio_register_device_node(struct
> device_node *of_node)
>
> /* needed to ensure proper operation of coherent allocations
> * later, in case driver doesn't set it explicitly */
> - dma_set_mask(&viodev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> - dma_set_coherent_mask(&viodev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&viodev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> }
>
> /* register with generic device framework */
>
The new helper routine dma_set_mask_and_coherent() breaks the
initialization of the pseries vio devices which do not have an
initial dev->dma_mask. I think we need to use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent()
instead.
Signed-off-by: C?dric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
index e7d0c88f..76a6482 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ struct vio_dev *vio_register_device_node(struct
device_node *of_node)
/* needed to ensure proper operation of coherent allocations
* later, in case driver doesn't set it explicitly */
- dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&viodev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&viodev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
}
/* register with generic device framework */
--
1.7.10.4
