> >> to DT nodes, but it isn't essential. So I'd like to move away from the >> 1:1 DT node/driver >> model as it seriously over complicates things. We have agreed we >> should possibly add >> a display virtual node in the DT bindings for a single driver to use >> as a binding point. > > Got it and thanks you for comments. The display virtual node seems > similar to super node posted by Russell King so just my concern is > that the display virtual node can be accepted by device tree people. > Anyway, I'll remove this patch. I really wish that the display virtual > node can lead us to more perfect world.
Just to confirm, Grant Likely was in the room for the discussion was quite happy to add them. Dave.
