On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Gareth Hughes wrote:

>> I'd like to second this request also.  Although Radeon DRI
>> doesn't work in 4.0.3, it would be a nice thing for Radeon users
>> if they could drop in the current DRI code and have a kernel that
>> is already set up.  It won't be long until packages are ready
>> that support Radeon DRI, so...
>
>There's a slight problem here -- the latest CVS code for the kernel
>modules is based on the new templated architecture.  Thus, we'd have to
>send a patch for the entire kernel subdirectory, and this doesn't really
>meet the 2.4 patch submission policies.
>
>I agree that we could just send it to Alan, but we'd have to get his
>latest patch working first.  I've been rather busy with other things
>lately, and don't know when this will happen.
>
>Besides, if you're using a CVS version of everything else, you really
>shouldn't be surprised that you have to use the CVS version of the
>kernel module.  No matter what, it's always going to be the most
>up-to-date version...

Ok, fair enough.  I didn't realize it wasn't just a simple thing
to cut.  No complaints from me.  ;o)



-- 
Mike A. Harris                  Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer             190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
Red Hat Inc.                    Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
http://www.redhat.com           Phone: (705)949-2136



_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to