Pontus, On 2002.01.19 15:33 Pontus Lidman wrote: > Hello, > > Like Mr. Jose Fonseca, I have some very positive experiences with the > Doxygen tool for documentation, and I warmly recommend it to the DRI > project. It produces good API documentation, and the documentation is > easy to maintain because of its integration in the source code. > > To try to show what it could do, I took some of the existing HTML > documentation from the web page, and put it into the appropriate > source file, xf86drm.c, generated documentation using Doxygen, and > published the result on a web page so you can take a look. > > Please visit http://h90.ryd.student.liu.se/~pontus/index.html to see > the results. The doxygen-annotated source is also available. >
It's a quite impressive demonstration of Doxygen capabilities indeed. With the cross references to the source it becomes superb to those newcomers that want to grasp the DRI code. > The reason I post is that I have become interested in the DRI project, > and will try to contribute. Based on the recent discussions on this > list, documentation seems to be an important area, and in my > experience the best time to contribute to that is while you are > learning :) > Agreed! > Regards, > > Pontus > > -- > Pontus Lidman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Software Engineer > No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up. > Scene: www.dc-s.com | MUD: tyme.envy.com 6969 | irc: irc.quakenet.eu.org > Unless anyone has a better suggestion I think this is the way to go. What do the "elder" developers think? Regards, José Fonseca _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel