On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > After digging around the code a bit, my current theory is that the > indirect buffer is incorrectly reused after the start of a new server > generation. The only difference I see in the radeon driver (which I > assume doesn't have the same problem?) is in the LeaveServer() function, > where it releases the indirect buffer. Can you try if that fixes the > problem? Yes this seems to have fixed it, here's the patch:
--- ati.2/r128_dri.c Mon Dec 31 06:00:11 2001
+++ ati.2-shurdeek/r128_dri.c Sun Jan 27 20:50:19 2002
@@ -308,6 +308,9 @@
info->sc_bottom = INREG(R128_SC_BOTTOM);
info->aux_sc_cntl = INREG(R128_SC_BOTTOM);
}
+ } else {
+ R128CCEFlushIndirect(pScrn);
+ R128CCEReleaseIndirect(pScrn);
}
}
Would please the responsible person in all projects (dri, xf86, gatos) apply it?
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
The product Microsoft sells isn't the software; it's comfort.
The product that Linux vendors usually sell is freedom.
msg02555/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
