Hi Jens, On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:32:02PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:
> At the moment I'm running with 24 bps, I'll have a try with 16 bps and 32 > bps, too. O.k., 16 bps looks the same, 32 bps "is not supported by radeon driver". Until now I copied the following files from the 'build/' directory to their appropriate place (permissions set accordingly): xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/ati_drv.o xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/atimisc_drv.o xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_drv.o xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_dri.so xc/programs/Xserver/GL/libglx.a xc/programs/Xserver/GL/dri/libdri.a xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/src/libGLcore.a xc/lib/GL/GL/libGL.so* xc/lib/GLU/libGLU.so* xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/radeon.o So am I supposed to replace the whole X11R6 tree ? BTW, the drivers from the main CVS trunk (first screenshot) double the frame rate compared to stock XFree86-4.2.0. The drivers from 'tcl-0-0-branch' (second screenshot) only show an increasement of about 50 %. Is this as expected ? I put the two FlightGear screenshots on: http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Radeon0[1,2].png Martin. P.S.: Followup-To: dri-devel. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
![http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Radeon0[1,2].png](http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Radeon0[1,2].png){kind=link}