Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>That's probably more of a rasterization/fill test than a T&L test, so >>it's not surprising there isn't a more significant increase. >> > > What tests do you recommend?
Pretty much all of the Mesa/GLUT demos are pointless these days for measuring T&L performance. Enlarging the window to these sizes makes them a fill test, and not a very good one at that :-) For real T&L performance measurements, you need to look at things like viewperf, maybe glperf, things like that. You basically need a polygonal model with 100K+ triangles before it gets interesting. Even then, you have to be careful about things like data submission and so on, to ensure you're really testing T&L performance and not AGP bandwidth, rasterization throughput etc. -- Gareth _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
