Mike Mestnik wrote: > > --- Micah Galizia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. I couldn't get it to compile under 2.4, but I think I was compiling > > against 2.5 headers. More importantly, where should I be getting source > > from? The source code at http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/ is 1.1.1; Is > > that right? > > That is the source I used, I'd further patch that with > ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/X11/XFree86/DRI/kernel-2.4.18-linux-drm-CVS-patch-1.0.0.gz > This contains good changes I found in kernel-2.4.18 that should not be removed > IMHO.
OK. Just letting people know I'm taking on the task of pulling these mods back from the kernel and massaging our modules to build under 2.4.x and 2.5.most-recent. Keith _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
