On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 08:08, Felix Kühling wrote: > On 30 May 2002 00:25:08 +0100 > "Sergey V. Udaltsov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Again and again I take snapshots, again "Permission denied" even for > > root. What could this be? Can it be related to gcc 3.1 I use to build > > the kernel module in the snapshot? Really strange situation to me... > > > > Regards, > > > > Sergey > > Hmm, I started using gcc-3.0.4 recently. I'm having 2 compiler versions > installed. I noticed that Makefile.linux in linux/drm/kernel ignores my > settings in host.def and uses the old compiler. I tried compiling the > kernel module with gcc-3.0.4 now. The first obvious thing was that I got > lots of these warnings: > > mach64_state.c:682: warning: concatenation of string literals with __FUNCTION__ is >deprecated. This feature will be removed in future > > But it's only warnings. > > When I started the Xserver it locked up after the first few 2D > operations while loading the window manager. But I could kill it with > the secure access key. I didn't see anything suspicious in XFree86.1.log > or the syslog at the point of the failure.
When DRI is disabled, the DRM is out of the picture actually. > But I see the following DRM related messages earlier in XFree86.1.log: > > (II) ATI(0): [drm] SAREA 2200+1212: 3412 > drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) > drmOpenDevice: Open failed > drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) > drmOpenDevice: Open failed > drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK) > drmGetBusid returned '' > (II) ATI(0): [drm] loaded kernel module for "mach64" driver > (II) ATI(0): [drm] drmSetBusid failed (6, PCI:1:0:0), Permission denied > (EE) ATI(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit Failed > > So I have the same permission problem and it only occurs with gcc 3. I noticed a while ago that building the DRM with gcc 3.x and the rest with 2.x or vice versa doesn't work. I imagine structs passed to ioctls get packed differently or something, which of course should be implemented in a way that it works regardless of the compiler implementation details... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
