On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > On Saturday 22 June 2002 16:15, Jens Owen wrote: > > Zilvinas, > > > > Thanks for posting this data. It's nice to see confirmation of how > > things were intended to work. > > I'll second that. > May I ask if Zilvinas could repeat with 60Hz? > I know that this is a "bad number" but the RAMDAC clock has some influence. > Most "official" benchmarks (Win) are made @60 Hz...
Ok if there is a interest :) in that data I see no problem ;) I will do that in a nearest future ;) I am wondering myself what (if any) difference that would make ;) > > Second: > My dual Athlon MP 1900+ (MSI K7D Master-L, AMD 760MPX) with 512MB DDR-SDRAM (1 > GB is comming soon) is up and running. 512MB RAM ABit KT7A-RAID (KT133A chipset) Single CPU (sighs. ...) Athlon XP 1800+ SDRAM (PC133). Radeon 7200 (QD model which is VIVO DDR 64MB ... another name for that.) > > I can get my hands on a Radeon 8500 and maybe a 7500, tomorrow or Monday. > I'll do some viewperf-6.1.2 numbers on my V5 5500 @24 bit tonight. I assume that these runs are done on Radeon (or it is V5 5500 ?) > > Mesa/demos> ./gloss > 596 frames in 5.006 seconds = 119.057 FPS <-- cylinder > 764 frames in 5.003 seconds = 152.708 FPS > 760 frames in 5.006 seconds = 151.818 FPS > 758 frames in 5.001 seconds = 151.57 FPS > > 483 frames in 5.004 seconds = 96.5228 FPS > 420 frames in 5.003 seconds = 83.9496 FPS > 420 frames in 5 seconds = 84 FPS > 421 frames in 5.008 seconds = 84.0655 FPS <-- teapot That's very interesting ... $ ./gloss radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0 radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0 1485 frames in 5.001 seconds = 296.941 FPS <- cylinder 1501 frames in 5 seconds = 300.2 FPS 1496 frames in 5.003 seconds = 299.021 FPS 1494 frames in 5.001 seconds = 298.74 FPS 1501 frames in 5 seconds = 300.2 FPS 1501 frames in 5.002 seconds = 300.08 FPS radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0 radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 1 1150 frames in 5.013 seconds = 229.404 FPS <-- teapot 146 frames in 5.017 seconds = 29.1011 FPS 147 frames in 5.027 seconds = 29.2421 FPS 146 frames in 5.011 seconds = 29.1359 FPS 146 frames in 5 seconds = 29.2 FPS 147 frames in 5.029 seconds = 29.2305 FPS 146 frames in 5.018 seconds = 29.0953 FPS 146 frames in 5.003 seconds = 29.1825 FPS there is a guite a difference here. Teapot is very slow ;) compared with your results :) > > ipers is running @20-22 fps (~580.000 Poly/sec) 532771.7 (poly.sec) @19 - 20.60 fps .... (not much slower ...) and here is isosurf ;) benchmark $ ./isosurf 7179 vertices, 7177 triangles radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0 Nr unique vertex/normal pairs: 2723 num_tri_verts: 21531 primitive (0x10000): GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP, render style (0x100): glVertex, enabling normal arrays new flags (0xa93169): glVertex, GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP, lit, radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0 radeon_makeX86Normal3fv/195 CVAL 0 OFFSET 14 VAL 405dece0 radeon_makeX86Normal3fv/196 CVAL 4 OFFSET 20 VAL 405dece4 radeon_makeX86Normal3fv/197 CVAL 8 OFFSET 25 VAL 405dece8 radeon_makeX86Normal3fv done radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 1 Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 4.4483e+06 fps: 619.8 Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 4.44974e+06 fps: 620 Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 4.45172e+06 fps: 620.276 Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 4.44974e+06 fps: 620 If my memory serves me right - last time I've tried it was much slower (well it was almost a have a year ago if not even more ;) T&L ? made guite an improvement.) > > Desktop resolution is 1280x1024@24 as always ;-) Same here. > > We need the Mesa (p)thread stuff badly 'cause all numbers are from single > theard/process mode (the second CPU was all the time 100% idle). > > Cheers, > Dieter > > -- > Dieter N?tzel > Graduate Student, Computer Science > > University of Hamburg > Department of Computer Science > @home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Zilvinas Valinskas ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
