On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 18:21, Michael Schlueter wrote: > Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 16.03 schrieb José Fonseca: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the > > >> SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones > > >> made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't > > >> so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to > > >> compile. Could you please try if these do any good? > > > > > >Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other > > >ones ... broken! > > > > > >Andrew > > > > This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous > > to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the > > current CVS. > > I've built a version from the 10 of June and it is working. The binary > snapshot from the 16.did work. So it is happen within that week.
This leaves http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=817856&forum_id=6512 as the primary suspect, or am I missing something? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
