On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Jos� Fonseca wrote:
>
[...]
>> 
>> Yep. That's it. Basically one needs to checkout the trunk, tag it with
>> the new mach64-0-0-5-branch, and then merge from the old branch (by
>> doing cvs update -r mach64-0-0-4-branch in each relevant dir). The PITA,
>> is adding the mach64 stuff to all Makefiles because the mach64 driver
>> was never merged back into the trunk...
>
>Wouldn't it be easier to do 'cvs update -j mach64-0-0-4-branch'?  That
>should merge everthing from the branch (changes relative to the
>branchpoint on the trunk), and I'll just have to merge any
>conflicts/rejects by hand.

Perhaps. What I suggested was what I've done the last time. I make no
claim that is the best method since as you can see my CVS knowledge is that deep! ;-)

On the other hand I could not see on the CVS manpage how the -j option
would have the effect you described. Is just a matter of trying anyway.

Perhaps you should try instead what is suggested on "HOW TO MERGE THE
TRUNK INTO YOUR BRANCH" in http://dri.sf.net/doc/cvspolicy.txt .

Alan, hint? (Or "How have you just done now with the s3virge branch?")

Jos� Fonseca


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! 
JabberConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to