I'm using 2.96, so I think I may have to start including all the DRI stuff in my patched XV binaries to avoid binary compatibility problems. This can also be caused by changes to the SAREA in the DRI branch, so I think it might be easier to keep things in sync that way. I got one report from someone who was having problems with mach64_dri.so, maybe a glibc version mismatch problem? He said using LIBGL_DEBUG with glxinfo indicated that mach64_dri.so needed glibc 2.3. My binaries are built with glibc 2.2.4, but I'm not sure yet if that was the problem. Again this was with my patched X sever binaries on top of the DRI snapshot.
I haven't tried the snapshots and I haven't heard from anyone using the vanilla snapshots without my patches yet, so I'm not sure if there are any problems there. --Leif On 28 Sep 2002, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: > > We also haven't recived feedback regarding non-radeon cards. > I would be happy to give some feedback on mach64 - but I am using Leif's > spanshots now (2.96-built AFAIK) - just because they give me xvideo. > Leif, are you still using 2.96 or moving to 3.x? > > Regards, > > Sergey > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
