Hi! Sun 29, 15:53:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote: > > > > It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK. However, glxinfo > > reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI, > > I'm including my log file for examination. > > I had something similar the other week. XFree86.log showed that X had > enabled DRI fine, but no acceleration worked. Enabling LIBGL_DEBUG showed > that any GLX app was unable to load the r200_dri.so file, even though > stracing the binary clearly showed that the open of the file (and mmap) > succeeded cleanly. R200_DEBUG showed absolutely nothing. > > Doing a "make clean + make World" fixed it for me - there's probably > something wrong with the dependencies in some makefile. > > Linus Hmm...What about binaries from dri.sf.net? Users who using it don't use cvs :) Maybe stop prducing "bad" code until source is being fixed? -- WBR, Konstantin ZAO ELKATEL Network/Security assistant -------------------------------------------------------- ...The information is like the bank... (c) EC8OR ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel