Hi!

Sun 29, 15:53:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

> 
> On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote:
> >
> > It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK.  However, glxinfo
> > reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI, 
> > I'm including my log file for examination.
> 
> I had something similar the other week. XFree86.log showed that X had
> enabled DRI fine, but no acceleration worked. Enabling LIBGL_DEBUG showed
> that any GLX app was unable to load the r200_dri.so file, even though
> stracing the binary clearly showed that the open of the file (and mmap)
> succeeded cleanly. R200_DEBUG showed absolutely nothing.
> 
> Doing a "make clean + make World" fixed it for me - there's probably 
> something wrong with the dependencies in some makefile.
> 
>               Linus
Hmm...What about binaries from dri.sf.net? Users who using it don't use
cvs :) Maybe stop prducing "bad" code until source is being fixed? 

-- 
WBR, Konstantin

ZAO ELKATEL Network/Security assistant
--------------------------------------------------------
        ...The information is like the bank... (c) EC8OR



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to