On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:25:40PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Get a clue. > > glibc 2.3 is used because its newer, because it fixes lots of bugs, > because its more standards compliant, because it uses new syscalls. > Everyone will be using it soon enough. > > glibc 2.3 is LSB compliant, like current Red Hat products.
I have to apologize for my comment. I did not meant to go into distribution politics and I hope I have not insulted anyone. I just do not like the idea that you need a specific distribution to be able to run certain software, even if it's only some daily graphics driver snapshots. cheers, Michael ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
