> release version, and using that. CVS versions of software often contain > new bugs and even security vulnerabilities, it is far more prudent to > work with a release version of such a major system component. Because of > this, most distros will probably wait until it becomes a release until > they include it.
Ask the glibc 2.3 maintainer. I can tell you for free that 2.3 contains fixes for security holes in 2.2-*. I can't tell you the holes because CERT won't let anyone yet. So thats not true. > As far as actually getting this done, redhat has provided cross compiler > rpms in the past, so you may be able to get these, and cross compile for > glibc2.2. I don't see a rough time for binary snapshots, just a rough > time for developers using cvs snapshots of glibc Yawn and its not a CVS snapshot. If instead of whining someone figured out why the weirdass XFree86 binary module load has problems with this we might get somewhere instead. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
