On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:56:22AM -0800, Daryll Strauss wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:20:07AM +0000, Ian Molton wrote: > > No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would > > know I intend to have a crack at Voodoo3 support and not drop any code > > on the floor. > > I would hope Ian R's texmem stuff doesn't mean dropping the remaining > drivers on the floor. That's not really a good choice. There's no > problem with some drivers getting the features of texmem and some not, > but dropping drivers is a bad idea. I'm glad you're interested in the > tdfx. That's still one of the more popular cards out there and getting > it updated and removing glide would be a big win.
NONONONO! The drivers that aren't updated WILL REMAIN in the tree. There is NO INTENTION of removing any functional drivers. That said, the texmem support, particularly the supprt to be added in the texmem-0-0-2 branch will enable the support of a lot of (mostly) device independent features. Drivers that don't get texmem updates will quick lag waaaay behind the others. -- Smile! http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990315.html ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
