On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:20PM -0600, D. Hageman wrote: > Those are some excellent examples of abuse. It doesn't have to be like > that. [..] > If we went with libxml2 it has no exterior dependencies that I am aware.
Probably I was harsh when I said no to XML. Using libxml is good from code reuse point for view. Parsing and emiting XML is simple. But, please make it readable for those who do not want to use GUI. The last thing, I suspect, many of us want to see is a config with tons of <param-name>param</param-name><param-value>value</param-value>. I think libxml is OK, as you said it is already in XFree86. Parsing time is not an issue, /bin/ls doesn't use DRI, OpenGL programs are rare started up. arkadi. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
