On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:25:41PM +0000, José Fonseca wrote:
> David, I don't know exactly if that was your point, but of all ways
> presented here to avoid catching exceptions with the 'new' operator,
> using 'set_new_hander' seems the best. It doesn't requires any include
> for every source file where 'new' is used, and also avoids duplicating
> the NULL check (already done internally by new) in every allocation.
> The only bad thing is that we can't tell when an allocation failed,
^^^^
|
Oops! It should had been "where"... --------+
> but the out-of-memory condition shouldn't appear in practice, and I'd
> rather have to fire gdb to find that out, than having to write
> "if(!(foo = new ..) == NULL) ..." around everywhere.
José Fonseca
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
