I've noticed the i830 drivers have a unified memory allocation scheme for 2d and 3d, is there any reason this couldnt be used on the i810?
Is there any major reasons the i830 driver couldn't be usd on the i810 with the functionality it doesn't need turned off?
I'm just wondering the i810/i830 drivers look very close and I persume were once unified and got separated somewhere for a reason.. just wondering was the reason because of something lowlevel that wasn't compatible or the author didn't want to break an old chipset he had no access to?
There is a lot in common, but there are a lot of differences at the hardware level too. I think it's a general problem with our drivers that we don't do enough sharing -- in this case you have completely different hardware registers and packets, and quite a few additional capabilities in the 830, but a lot of similarities too. It would be nice to share more of the code.
There have been some discussions about this on this list already...
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
