On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:17:51AM +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 02:28, Jos� Fonseca wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:18:17PM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote: > > > for dri-announce, dri-devel, dri-users, dri-patches > > > i have now enabled the mailman option "member_posting_only". > > > this is done for stopping the major portion of spam > > > as we have seen it coming via the list in recent times. > > > > > > dri-announce already was set to the aproval plight, > > > so there wont shift anything at all for that list. > > > > > > if you do need to send from elsewhere than your > > > subscribed reader account then you have to subscribe > > > from that account as well. you might want to disable > > > delivery in that case, see respective options page. > > > > > > i further tuned the number of allowed addresses > > > in mail headers a little bit in order to less > > > impact discussions with a bigger number of > > > directly addressed people. that change should > > > not have any impact on the spam issue in 99.9%. > > > > I think it would be better to open dri-patches to all > > @users.sourceforge.net otherwise commiters (which are subscribed with > > other email address besides the SF one or not subscribed at all) > > Absolutely, as I have pointed out before. :) I think we can even drop > the rest without admin intervention and point people towards dri-devel > in the reject message.
I agree. Discussions should be held on dri-devel, even those about patches. Dri-patches shoud be "read-only". Jos� Fonseca ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
