On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:57:14PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: | ... | If we take away the ability to add functions to the GLX function table, | is it really useful for drivers to be able to add new extensions at all? | That would also remove the need for the force_client parameter to | __glXEnableExtension. There isn't much opportunity for "enum-only" | extensions in GLX like there is in GL. Brian, Keith, Allen, can any of | you think of a compelling argument for this functionality?
Nope. I'd give more weight to the opinions from Brian and Keith than to mine, though; I haven't thought about any of this recently. Allen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
